Monday, November 5, 2012

Sex: Working through discrepancy in desire


The desire to feel deeply connected to another is a universal human need. Emotional and Physical closeness are the two main ways couples can experience this connection.  


But often in couples, there is this unhappy paradox: One member of the couple wants more physical/sexual connection while the other wants more verbal/emotional connecting. Further, each of them thinks of the other’s need as excessive and feels burdened by it.

In the psychology world, when one member of a couple wants more sexual connection than the other we call it Sexual Desire Discrepancy (SDD).  This is a common complaint among couples visiting marriage and sex therapists. 

Interestingly, the psychology world has yet to come up with a label for Emotional Desire Discrepancy (EDD, for our purposes); when one member of a couple wants more emotional connection than the other. Yet, I find this problem to be as common among my clients (if not more) than SDD. 

In both cases these unmet or under-met desires can cause great unhappiness.

Jack and Jill can’t get up the hill because neither feels the other desires them. Jill feels that Jack has no desire to know her emotionally.  Jack feels that Jill has no interest in himsexually. Jack and Jill both want to feel closer and more connected. They have been busy with their lives and haven’t had sex in a couple of weeks.

When we meet them in their kitchen, Jill has just gotten off the phone with her mother. She walks into the kitchen where she finds Jack cooking dinner.

“God, my mother is going to make me crazy. She just cancelled plans to come to our house for Christmas because she can’t leave her dogs,” Jill said.

“I don’t know why you’re so angry.  She always does that,” Jack said.

“That’s why I’m so mad!  She puts her dogs ahead of visiting us and the kids.”

“It’s not her dogs,” Jack said.  “She just hates to leave her home because she’s a stick in the mud, always has been.”  Jill looks away.

Jack wonders why she quit talking.

“You know it’s true. She just can’t have any fun,” Jack says. 

“Whatever,” Jill mumbles.

A little later Jack feels Jill continuing to be distant; it’s hard to ignore the slamming of kitchen cabinets and generally cold demeanor.  Wanting to connect he walks over and puts his arms around her, kissing her as he whispers, “It’s been a couple of weeks, maybe we should have some sex tonight.”  

Jill offers, “Maybe,” but pulls away because she is still annoyed about the earlier conversation.

A few hours later in bed Jack and Jill have their arms around each other as they kiss. Jack touches Jill’s leg; she touches his.  His breathing is quick and shallow as he becomes aroused. He assumes she is aroused, so he slides his hand between her legs. She tries to relax and enjoy it, but feels annoyed that he seems to be rushing her.  She is not lubricated yet, so Jack feels she is not turned on by him. He stops.

They turn over and go to sleep, both frustrated they can’t seem to get in sync with each other. Jack thinks to himself, “Jill is just like her mother.  She never wants to have fun.”  Jill thinks back to the kitchen conversation and Jack’s haste in bed and thinks, “What an insensitive guy!”

Next time, we will get Jack and Jill up the hill and try to keep them from tumbling down.  By paying attention to and honoring the other’s primary desire and responding differently based on this awareness, each can actually get their own desires met.  It’s a change in mindset that can alter the discrepancies in desire that trouble most marriages

Stay tuned.

Gerald Drose is an Atlanta-based couples’ sex therapist.  Visit Dr. Drose at Powers Ferry Psychological Associates, LLC.   

Anger at partner might be path to deeper question: What Do I Need?


Leslie sat in an extra chair in my office, not on the couch next to Robert as she usually did. I looked at Robert and he looked weary.

“I’m mad as hell,” Leslie started. “He stayed out until 3:00 in the morning without calling me.” Turning to Robert, “You have no respect for my feelings…you never have and you never will. You’re such a self-centered son-of-a-bitch. I’m at home trying to get some sleep so I can get up at 6:30 in the morning for a meeting, and you’re out playing around, doing whatever you want to.”

Robert sighed. “I told you I was going to be out with my best friend ‘til late. I hadn’t seen George in a year. I’ve apologized. I lost track of the time and didn’t want to call and wake you when I realized what time it was. Why didn’t you call me?”

Leslie seethed. “Don’t try to turn this around on me! Where were you? At a strip club? Out picking up bimbos? I’m home doing the right thing and you’re out doing God-knows-what!” 

Robert leaned away from Leslie and looked at me. “This is just ridiculous. We’ve been arguing about this for two days. She’s not going to let it go. It’s just ridiculous.”

“You’re ridiculous!”

“You’re a controlling bitch!” Robert blurted out.

“You arrogant ass-hole! I should’ve divorced you years ago,” Leslie said before throwing one of my pillows at her husband. 

Out beyond ideas of right-doing and wrong-doing there is a field. I'll meet you there. ----- Rumi, 13th century Sufi poet

Sometimes couples arrive at my office, sounding like the couple above. (Most of us married people have sounded like this couple at some point.) When I hear couples engaged in this drama, I know that underneath the fight, each participant is actually yearning for their partner to intuitively hear the need beneath the anger, to empathize, understand, validate and even meet the need (without it ever being stated out loud)! 
  
But how does someone who is being called an arrogant ass-hole or a controlling bitch listen with empathy, understanding and validation? Attack-language, name-calling and threatening to leave are designed to punish: You hurt me, now you should suffer equally~Attack-language seeks to prove who is the Perpetrator and who is the Victim, and to punish the offender accordingly.

But here’s the problem: even if the offender is punished, the attacker’s needs will continue to go unmet if they don’t learn to express themselves differently.

Now I know this is complicatedSharing your needs with your partner makes you vulnerable; especially if your needs were ignored, invalidated or dismissed as a kid or in a past romantic relationship, it may be difficult to, A): know what your needs are, B): feel like you have a right to speak them out loud, or C): know what to do when someone knows what your needs are, but says “Sorry, I can’t or won’t or don’t want to meet those needs.” (Just because you ask for something, doesn’t mean the other has to give it to you!) Because this venture is so complicated, so wrought with buried pain and brings up such shame and vulnerability, anger is often the default “safe” response.  

In the short run, anger feels good, empowering, righteous (for some, even addictive).  But in the long run, it is always ineffective.  

My job is to help my clients discover the tender, all-too-human, universal needs hidden beneath the rage. 

I said to Leslie and Robert, “I can see how angry you all are.  It looks like your anger is interfering with your ability to know what you actually need right now. Can you try go under the anger and discover what that need might be?”

After a few prompts, Leslie responded: “I feel hurt and scared.  I wonder what he was doing that night…”

“What is the need that makes you wonder that?”

Leslie’s responded, “I need to feel safe, like I can trust him. I’m scared he might be lying to me. Maybe he’s having an affair.”

Robert interrupted,  “Leslie, the last thing I would do is have an affair. I was with George.  I hadn’t seen him in a year and we drank too much. That’s all. I’m sorry. I never stay out like that. It was just like, you know, being in college again. It was irresponsible, I agree, and I felt like shit the next day at work. I’m sorry!”

“What do you need right now, Leslie?”

“I need him to commit to me that he won’t do it again.  It’s okay for him to go out, but I need him to call and check in so I don’t have to worry.”

“Can you give Leslie this, Robert?”

“Of course!  I thought I said it. I’m sorry. I’ll call next time. You know I don’t normally do things like this. The last thing I would want is for you to be worrying about me when you need to be sleeping.”

Listen to how the conversation changed when Leslie got out of her anger and expressed her needs and fears directly.  Anger can prevent our partners from hearing the content of what we are actually saying because the tone produces an instinctual reaction of defensiveness and self-protection.  Anger can also block us from being aware of our real needs.  Instead of just letting the anger fly, slow down and see if the anger might be a path to a deeper question: what do I need right now?

After this exchange, I asked Robert what he needed.  “I just need her to believe me, believe in me, and remember who I am. I never come home late, right?” he asked Leslie.

“I know,” Leslie quickly said. “I was just…”

“I know,” Robert said.

And the drama was over.

There are reasons that we are so good at feeling angry and yet so bad at knowing what we really need. One very prominent reason is that our culture actually teaches us this.



Gerald Drose is an Atlanta-based couples’ sex therapist.  Visit Dr. Drose at Powers Ferry Psychological Associates, LLC.   

Men Bad, Women Good, and Other Such Nonsense


I was procrastinating the other night and came upon a blog on the Psychology Todaywebsite written by a psychiatrist and a freelance writer who have written a book together, titled, The Tiger Woods Syndrome. (Talk about capitalizing on another’s pain!) The book by Dr. Jerry Burns and R.A. Richards is purportedly about repairing relationships.

The following passage from their blog supposedly gives women THE KEY to understanding men:

How often have you women readers heard a female friend complaining about her spouse, describing a litany of obnoxious traits and grumpy disposition? Then when asked why she would have ever married such a boorish lout, her response is, "Well, Frank was nothing like this when we were dating.”

Women readers, that is the key (my emphasis) to understanding men. Men aren't their true selves when they are dating you. They seek superficial values, hide their true feelings and conform to win their dream girl. Commercials, television shows, movies and even music drum into men's brains that conformity and deception are part of the dating and mating scene. Men readers, admit it...these are our culturally ingrained techniques to "successful" dating.

In my opinion, their book is somewhere close to the last book you should ever read if you truly want to understand men and improve your relationship.  Granted, there are a small percentage of women married to severely disturbed men who should run—not walk—away from their marriages.  Similarly, there are some men married to women with severe character problems who should get out. 

The rest of us need to recognize that we are as screwed up as our partner.  It’s not: Men Good, Women Bad or vice versa.  The superficial culture, early family life and chromosomes pretty much guarantee that both genders will be pretty inept at figuring out this whole relationship-thing.

Both men AND women love to complain about the “obnoxious traits and grumpy dispositions” of their spouses, but these are not reasons to leave or brand the other with a new fancy label (“Hey Jan. I finally understand Ralph; he has Tiger Woods Syndrome!”).  The authors are promoting a narrative as silly and damaging as narratives of bygone days (e.g. All Women are Stupid). That is, All Men are Bad in Relationships. 

Over the past 23 years I have worked closely with hundreds of men in psychotherapy. I have gained a tremendous amount of respect for these regular guys who are working on improving their relationships. They genuinely want closer, more intimate relationships with their wives and family members. They actually come to therapy of their own volition, not kicking and screaming, as many writers like to portray. 

Not surprisingly, however, at some point these men complain about their partners, trying to sell me (and themselves) the story that their wives performed a “Bait and Switch.”  “When we were dating, she wanted sex all the time. She cooked special meals for me. She was sensitive and loving, but no more.  Now I see who she REALLY is.”

(Note how similar this sounds to the way the authors describe the ways wives talk about their husbands.)

I do not, however, agree that their wives conned them in the past and are currently the source of all their misery (as the authors apparently do with the women they describe). Instead, I get them to try to understand how they are now different, and how being in the relationship has changed them both.  If they want improvements, they need to discover how they can make positive changes within the relationship.  I refuse to accept their story of victimization, blame, and hopelessness; this would only reinforce their lack of responsibility and fuel the belief that finding a better wife is the answer. 

This level of honesty is not easy, but sometimes saying the things that people don’t want to hear is the best gift I can give.  While we secretly yearn for support for our position of Goodness and our partner’s Badness, in fact we need friends/therapists/authors who will say something closer to the Truth. 


Lori Gottlieb, author of Marry Him: The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough begs for this level of honesty from her friendsAs she puts it, “instead of a frenzied pack of enablers nurturing our self-delusion, what we need is someone brave enough to give us the truth.”


Why don’t friends confront our delusions? Have you ever listened to a friend blame her problems on someone else and tried to talk sense into her?  If you start with, “Do you want to know what I really think?” chances are she will say “Yes” but mean, “Not if you don’t agree with me.”  If you have the courage to speak an uncomfortable truth, chances are your friend could get defensive and upset with you, which could truly test the friendship.  If you are lucky and the two of you stick with it, you may experience your relationship at a much deeper level than before you were honest.  But it’s a scary road to travel so many just agree!


Many therapists and authors succumb to this same basic human fear, too. They just want to be loved!  A therapist may reinforce your self-delusion because they are afraid that if you feel too uncomfortable in the office that you may not return for another session or worse you might come back with anger. As for authors, writing a book basically called “Men Bad, Women Good” or to reverse it, “Bitches and Hoes,” will attract a significant segment of the market (e.g. people who like to blame others for their misery).  


I urge you to seek and speak the truth.  It isn’t easy.


Gerald Drose is an Atlanta-based couples’ sex therapist. Visit Dr. Drose at Powers Ferry Psychological Associates, LLC

Sunday, November 4, 2012

What Is a "Good Enough" Divorce?


In my last column, I wrote about my bias towards staying married rather than giving up on a relationship.  Ginger Emas left a comment saying she and her ex-husband John divorced after 14 years of couple’s therapy. She thanks her years of couple’s therapy for helping her and her ex have an “unbelievable divorce,” in which they are very close friends.

Not that she needs my blessing on her divorce, but I think we could all agree that working on a marriage for 14 years is a noble effort and if there is something primary that is still missing from the marriage after all of that effort, then divorce probably makes good sense.

In my last column, I talked about Bill.  Bill left two marriages into which he put minuscule effort—or at least minimal effort compared to Ginger and her husband.  In fact, Bill only came in to see me after he had made up his mind to leave his marriage.  When it came down to it, Bill wanted my help justifying his reasons for leaving his marriage.

Each of Bill’s divorces ended up as contentious as his marriages.

Ginger’s comments started me thinking about my own divorce.  The first time I married, I was 25.  The woman I married was a woman I fell in love with about six or seven months before the wedding.  We were both obviously impulsive (how else would we have married that quickly?) but also overwhelmed with passion and a shared desire to get our life started.

We married, I started graduate school and she soon became pregnant.

I won’t share the details of our failed marriage because it wouldn’t be fair to her (since she has not decided to share her side of the story). Suffice it to say, we were as immature at handling the give and take, compromise and conciliation required of successful spouses as we had been impulsive and passionate. Even though I was getting my PhD in Clinical Psychology, at 27 years old I only gave couple’s therapy a cursory try.

We separated and divorced before our son was three.  I’m not proud of how easily I gave up and got a divorce given that I had a small child. My only apology is that it was almost 30 years ago and as the wise older woman in “Moonstruck” said, as she explained to the hapless professor why his young lover emptied a full martini in his face, “What I didn’t know about being a man was a lot.” (Forgive me for my shameless paraphrasing).  

Let me tell you a few things about my divorce of which I am proud.  My ex-wife and I shared equal custody of our son and argued on and off passionately throughout the time our son grew up.  We both made huge sacrifices to make sure he got to important family functions of each parent’s family. I stayed in therapy to learn to better compromise and work with my ex-wife in ways I had not done when we were married.

The first time my current wife, Dina met my ex-wife was when my ex surprised us by coming into town unexpectedly and using her key to my apartment where our son was sleeping. Dina and I were asleep in my bed when my ex came into our bedroom to tell us that she was going to be sleeping in the spare bedroom.  I introduced Dina to her that night and they had breakfast together the next day.  There wasn’t anything weird about my ex-wife “crashing” in my spare bedroom so she could wake up with our son and help with the morning routine getting him off to school.  That was 20 years ago. 

One of my proudest “divorce accomplishments” was renting a house with my ex-wife for the weekend of our son’s graduation from college.  My wife and I, along with my ex, her husband and all of our children, spent 48 very good hours together in the same house.  The whole situation was completely…comfortable.  While in the past we were not always the model of the perfect divorce, that weekend we were.

A few years ago, my ex-wife called and said, “I couldn’t imagine a better ex-husband than you.”  She thanked me for being so wonderful and apologized for the role she played in our arguments over the years. Her words left me speechless because, trust me, I had behaved badly many times.   The truth is we are better together after the divorce than we were as a married couple. 

My ex-wife is a good person and I learned a lot from her about being a better man.  I was fortunate in my second marriage to marry a woman who helped temper my response to my ex, and enthusiastically took on the step-parenting role.  I think my ex-wife would say the same thing about her current husband.  

Hindsight is 20-20. If I had it to do over again, I would not have walked away from my first marriage so easily. At the same time, I am grateful for the marriage that Dina and I have built, and for our two beautiful boys.  Whenever a young couple with a child comes to see me and tells me they married too quickly because they were passionately in love, I have to be careful that my desire for their marriage to succeed isn’t stronger than theirs. Many young couples simply lack the maturity to make it work; commitment, empathy, assertiveness, perspective, tolerance, and self-soothing can take years to develop.  If, after all the work of therapy, a couple decides to divorce, I will try to help them learn those same skills.  That way they may not only experience a "good divorce," but they'll be much more prepared for a good marriage next time around. 


Gerald Drose is an Atlanta-based couples’ sex therapist.  Visit Dr. Drose at Powers Ferry Psychological Associates, LLC.   

Divorce: Should You Stay or Should You Go?


Fairly often I have a client ask whether or not his marriage is bad enough to justify a divorce. Even though they ask, I think they know this not the kind of question I can answer for them.  It’s a personal call.

But as a psychologist I have a unique perspective. I get to see people at every phase of life; whether they are struggling or thriving in a marriage, in the process of divorcing, divorced, dating new people, remarried or even living unmarried in old age.  I have even seen the same person through each of these phases over the course of their lifetime.  This perspective has biased me in favor of working out problems in marriages rather than dissolving them.  This is true in relationships with or without kids, although the presence of children ups my bias toward saving the marriage.

In the early 90’s I started working with Bill, a hard driving young businessman who had started a company and built it into a thriving enterprise. While his work life was great, his home life had collapsed; hence, his trip to see me.

Bill was married with two young girls, ages six and four. He described his wife as hostile, selfish and child-like in her neediness. According to him, she would punish him for weeks if he had to go out of town for business trips, resented his success, and rarely showed anything but hostility towards him when he was home. He was asking for my support to help him end his marriage.

I suggested couples’ therapy, but he stated gravely, “The time for that was a couple of years ago. I have no interest in subjecting myself to her abuse anymore. I just want to leave without creating any more hostility and minimize the pain for my daughters.”

Despite my anti-divorce bias, his arguments were convincing.  It was his choice after all.  So we turned our attention to making the best of a bad situation for him and his girls. We spent the next two years helping everyone adjust to the divorce.  Bill got on Prozac fordepression and began to neglect his business. He sold his company and stayed on as a consultant, but was eventually fired because of his lack of focus at work.

A few months later, Bill started dating “a gorgeous and very positive” lawyer whom he had met during business. He described her as the opposite of his wife: “very independent, kind-hearted and giving.”  He became completely swept up in the new relationship and felt his life was back on track.  On a high, he discontinued his Prozac and his therapy.

Four years later, Bill returned.  He had been married to the lawyer for three years, and had started a new business venture which was doing very well.  The problem was that the lovely young lawyer was now “showing her true colors.” In fact, he stated, “She is more abusive and needier than my ex.”

Bill knew I wasn’t completely surprised. At the time of his original therapy I had suggested to him that if people do not learn some key life lessons, they may create relationships one after the other that are almost identical.  Either they choose partners with similar issues or they find someone who allows them to enact a similar role each time.  While Bill didn’t buy this argument at that time, he had to admit that his life was unfolding “Second Verse, Same as the First.”

But this time Bill agreed to bring his wife for couple’s therapy.

When the three of us met I was able to see Bill in a new light. While I had known that Bill could be a workaholic, what I did not know was that as soon as his relationship felt solid, he would bury himself in work and become completely absent to his partner. He would leave for the office early in the morning and return late at night.  When his wife asked for some attention or affection, he felt criticized by her. He would then withdraw from her when he was home and even stay at work longer to avoid the conflict. The only way to get him to pay attention to the relationship (or appear to anyway) was to pick horrible fights with him.  He’d start coming home earlier, but he’d feel so angry and hurt that he would completely withdraw.

“There’s no way to reach him,” his wife said.  

Bill had always described himself as loving and completely accepting of his wife, and in a way he was. He expected very little from her and when they weren’t in the midst of hostilities he could be very affectionate.  That is, when he wasn’t working…which it turned out he thought he should be doing all of his waking hours.

(Notice, that the complete story never arrives in the therapy room until the spouse does.)

His lawyer wife was also pretty accepting, but when she reached her limit she could become horribly abusive. She would scream, cry, call him names, and then wonder why he withdrew into his work.  They had built a relationship that brought out the worst in each of them.

After our fifth couple’s session, Bill called to cancel the next session. He had moved out when his wife slapped him in the face during an argument. He scheduled an individual session with me several weeks later and fell into the same pattern of depression and anger as he and his wife moved through their divorce.  Again, I helped him cope as well as possible with his divorce.

Fast forward to a few months ago.  I got a call from Bill and scheduled an individual session. It’s been 17 years since he made his decision to leave his first wife. He is no longer a young businessman and of course I’m not a young psychologist, either. We’re both greyer and our facial lines are a little deeper.

Bill’s smile is tired yet warm. Now in his late 50’s, he has just sold his company for an amount of money that should have made him happy, but there is a heaviness anddepression in his voice. Wealthier than he could have ever hoped to be, his life is empty because he has no one with whom to share his success. He does feel some satisfaction that his daughters seem to be happy and successful in their young adult lives. But he wishes he saw them more as they seem to coordinate most of their lives around their mother and visit him mostly as afterthought.

I ask Bill if he’s dating anyone. He shakes his head and sighs. “I don’t really have much interest in that. I’ve read that story all the way to its sad ending. I don’t need to go through that again.”

Bill is as depressed as I’ve seen him. His ex-wives might tell you that he wanted to be alone by the way that he treated them. But the truth is, despite his tendency to disappear when he is in a relationship he does not do well without one.

My job with Bill now is to help him go back through some of his relationships and learn from them. He has to believe is that there is hope that if he invests again in a relationship that the story will end differently this time. But his hope has to be real; he has to learn that he can be different with a woman and create a different kind of relationship. If he can do that, his story might eventually have a happy ending. 

I look across at the graying businessman slouching before me and without much thought ask him if he wishes he could go back in time and try to figure it all out with his first wife.

“Of course, she wasn’t really that bad. I was just so obsessed with work and I didn’t know how to deal with her anger,” he said.

“So learning how to be less obsessed is important,” I say. “Maybe that’ll be easier now that you’ve so clearly made it in business. Believing that you can stand up to a woman, be with her and tell her what you think rather than avoiding her, that’s what you needed 17 years ago and what you need now to get back into living your life, right?”

Bill swishes his Starbucks Latte around in his Venti cup and smiles, again, warm and tired. “So you gonna give me a pill for that?”

I start to say something and he interrupts. “I want to believe I can do that, yeah.” He looks back into his latte. “I can see how that would change things…”


Gerald Drose is an Atlanta-based couples’ sex therapist.  Visit Dr. Drose at Powers Ferry Psychological Associates, LLC.   

Relationships: Who Makes the First Move Towards Repair After the Fight?


Jim and Susan came to see me for therapy when their children were young.  Susan told me she was fed up with Jim's anger and was going to divorce him unless he learned to control his temper.

“I have asked him to address this problem for years before our kids were born," she said. "Now our oldest is five and Jim STILL yells and calls me names.  It’s only a matter of time before he’s going to yell at the kids or worse, the kids will start to imitate him.”

Jim admitted his anger was a problem.  They came for marital therapy and Jim worked hard in separate individual sessions.  He learned to catch his anger before it escalated, take breaks and agreed to never call his wife names again.  When they ended therapy, they were quite content with their marriage.

But years later, Jim and Susan returned to my office. Their kids were now young teens. Once again they were coming in at Susan’s insistence, Susan said Jim was slipping into “old behavior.”  But now instead of calling her names, he’d get angry and “brood” for days at a time. 

Susan said she was worn out by Jim making her feel lousy for a few days out of every month.

Digging deeper, we discovered that Susan was also angry because she felt she was always responsible for rebuilding the bridge between them following these arguments. 

During his brooding periods, she’d leave him a voicemail at work, telling him how much she loved him and inviting him out for a date that weekend.  This seemed to free Jim from his emotional funk, and the relationship would start to feel better again.

Jim never initiated these re-connections, and Susan was tired of doing all the turn-around work.

So let’s return to our metaphor of the couple on the handcar on the tracks.   Jim and Susan were a long way ahead of where they used to be. Jim was no longer having angry outbursts, but his brooding continued to take them down the negative track.  At some point, Susan would feel compelled to do all the hard work applying the brakes.

In most relationships, one partner takes on the brake-person role. Not only is it hard work stepping out from behind your defenses, but the initiator is in the more vulnerable position.  The other person has the power to decide if and when they are ready to accept the peace offering.  Not surprisingly, over time the brake person will become resentful about this state of affairs. 

But changing this pattern can be difficult. An interesting thing happened when we tried to get Jim to initiate the reconnection. At first he was resistant, he felt like he couldn’t get himself to try some of the ideas we had agreed on for him to initiate. He realized how hard this was and now he understood how hard it must have been for Susan to always have to be the one sticking her neck out.

However, when he was finally able to make efforts to be the first one to reconnect Susan actually rejected his efforts.  So when Jim actually tried to put the brakes on during the course of an argument Susan was resistant to his efforts. She would insist that while he was trying to reconnect she was still angry about the argument.

Jim and Susan eventually realized with a sense of humor something important about human behavior. Sometimes it’s just crazy how we cling to what we are used to. Susan was very good at putting on the brakes in an ongoing argument and Jim was good at letting go and reconnecting once she did. Both of these roles are critical to getting the handcar moving along the tracks in a positive direction again.

A couple of questions you might ask about your relationship:

            *Who puts on the brakes when you are moving in a negative direction and how do they do it?

            *Does the other feel compelled to “pay the brake person back” for their deed by putting their own effort into the relationship?

In relationships we're always heading in a direction, either forwards or backwards. Understanding how to efficiently operate the vehicle that carries the relationship helps you go where you want to go.  

Gerald Drose is an Atlanta-based couples’ sex therapist.  He is a regular ShareWIK.com columnist. Visit Dr. Drose at Powers Ferry Psychological Associates, LLC.

Sex is Like a Railroad Handcar: Pushing or Pulling...


Visualize your relationship like this:  You and your partner are standing on a railroad handcar.  You know, one of those cars that moves along the train tracks being pumped by two people on opposite sides of the car. When one pushes down, the other side lifts up, rests and then pushes down, causing the other side to push down, etc.  This up/down cycle moves the railroad car along the tracks.

Got it?

An example:  You come home after a lousy day. You’re angry because the house is a mess despite your partner being home for at least an hour.

You say, “Look at this place. It’s a total mess. Nobody does anything around here but me.” (You push the handle down and the car begins to move along the tracks.)

Your partner responds, “What’s wrong with you coming in here yelling? You’re such a jerk!” (He/she pushes and now you’re really moving).

You say, “You asshole!”

Your partner says: “I’m minding my own business and you come in here raising hell. Who is the asshole here?”

The little car zips along the tracks toward a bad night. At some point you or your partner might say: “Hey, I’m sorry about earlier. I didn’t need to talk to you that way.” The car stops.

The other says: “You’re an ass.” The train resumes its negative direction.
Or the other says: “Yeah, me too. I had a bad day. You want to go… sit and talk, watch TV, go for a walk?" Now the handcar moves along the track in a different, more positive direction.

Another example. You give your partner a kiss and warmly say, “I’ve missed you, you want to have some fun tonight?” You’ve got the handcar heading in a sexual direction.
He or she might be distracted and irritated about something else and says: “I’ve got a lot of work to do tonight.” The car stops.

You say: “I was just kissing you not asking you to give up your job. All you really care about is work.”

“Somebody has to be responsible around here,” your partner fires back.  Now the handcar zips along the negative track and in a very nonsexual direction.

Sometimes people tell me that they have no control over their relationship. They describe their partner as driving the train along the track and they feel nothing they do will change anything.

I ask them to think of the train like the handcar and do two things:
1. When their partner pushes the handle driving the train in the negative direction, they simply try to apply the brakes and get the train going in a positive direction.
2. When their partner pushes the train in a positive direction they should always do their part by pushing it in the same direction.

Let’s look at the two examples above and illustrate how you can apply the brakes and push the handcar in a positive direction.

In the example where your partner returns home and criticizes you when he or she returns to the house, you could put on the brakes by stating you have been very productive or resting from a difficult day.

In the example where your partner has asked you for intimacy and you focused on your work angering and/or hurting your partner you can attempt to change the direction of the handcar by saying, “I miss you too, but I just have a lot of work to do tonight.” You might then try your own hand at moving the handcar in a sexual direction.

In relationships, you are always moving in some direction and it is a mutual process. Most people underestimate their role in the direction their relationships are moving. 

Tonight, try to intentionally move your relationship in the direction you want it to go and see if you don’t notice an immediate difference. 

Gerald Drose is an Atlanta-based couples’ sex therapist.  He is a regular ShareWIK.com columnist. Visit Dr. Drose at Powers Ferry Psychological Associates, LLC.